Khosravi v Connolly & anor [2013] NSWLEC 1122
Damage to one section of concrete path was caused by respondents' Banksia tree root, but the claimed losses were excessive given the path's poor construction and pre-existing condition. The Court limited compensation to 50% of the cost of replacing only the removed section, subject to a $200 cap, as this reflected both causation and contributory factors.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld in part; limited compensation ordered
- Legal Topics
- ['tree Disputes' 'neighbour Disputes' 'compensation for Property Damage']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether trees owned by respondents caused damage to applicant's property" 'Whether applicant is entitled to compensation for damage to property allegedly caused by roots of trees on neighbouring property']
Ratio Decidendi
Damage to one section of concrete path was caused by respondents' Banksia tree root, but the claimed losses were excessive given the path's poor construction and pre-existing condition. The Court limited compensation to 50% of the cost of replacing only the removed section, subject to a $200 cap, as this reflected both causation and contributory factors.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld in part; limited compensation ordered
Orders
- ['Applicant may replace the section of concrete pathway identified; must do so within 6 months.' 'Respondents to reimburse applicant 50% of the cost of this work, to a maximum of $200.00, within 21 days of receiving tax invoice.' 'Application for compensation for remaining path, fence panel, and gate dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment