COLLIER and ANOR v SENGOS and ANOR [1994] NSWCA 55
There was no conduct that constituted a breach of the undertaking as Mr Sengos did not enter into a contract of sale during the period specified; entering into an agency agreement was not prohibited by the terms of the undertaking and thus did not amount to contempt of court.
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr and Mrs Collier; Respondent: Mr Peter Sengos; Respondent: Mr Domenico Mosca
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion for Contempt / Court of Appeal, Motion to Strike Out Contempt Proceedings
- Outcome
- Notices of motion granted. Motion for contempt struck out. Applicants ordered to pay costs of the present respondents.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Undertaking, Mortgage, Injunction, Agency Agreement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr and Mrs Collier
Applicant
Mr Peter Sengos
Respondent
Mr Domenico Mosca
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion for Contempt / Court of Appeal, Motion to Strike Out Contempt Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Sengos' entry into an agency agreement constituted a breach of undertaking to the court
- 2 Whether conduct by Mr Sengos or Mr Mosca amounted to contempt of court
Ratio Decidendi
There was no conduct that constituted a breach of the undertaking as Mr Sengos did not enter into a contract of sale during the period specified; entering into an agency agreement was not prohibited by the terms of the undertaking and thus did not amount to contempt of court.
Court Disposition
Notices of motion granted. Motion for contempt struck out. Applicants ordered to pay costs of the present respondents.
Orders
- Motion for contempt brought by Mr and Mrs Collier struck out
- Applicants (Mr and Mrs Collier) ordered to pay the costs of Mr Sengos and Mr Mosca
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment