R v Austin; Ex parte Farmers and Graziers Co-operative Co Ltd [1964] HCA 48
The Commissioner had no jurisdiction to make orders for payment of wages and for treating the relevant period as service under the Award; the orders were an attempted enforcement of legal rights not constituting an inter-State industrial dispute and not within the Commission's power.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Writ of Prohibition / High Court Judgment on Application
- Outcome
- Order absolute; application for prohibition granted
- Legal Topics
- ['writ of Prohibition' 'jurisdiction of Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Commission' 'retrospective Variation of Award' 'enforcement of Award' 'industrial Dispute']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Writ of Prohibition / High Court Judgment on Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Commissioner had jurisdiction to order payment of wages and treat period between dismissal and re-engagement as service' 'Whether there was an inter-State industrial dispute' 'Whether the orders were an impermissible exercise of judicial power']
Ratio Decidendi
The Commissioner had no jurisdiction to make orders for payment of wages and for treating the relevant period as service under the Award; the orders were an attempted enforcement of legal rights not constituting an inter-State industrial dispute and not within the Commission's power.
Court Disposition
Order absolute; application for prohibition granted
Orders
- ['Order absolute in prohibition' 'Costs including costs of the order nisi to be paid by the respondent Union']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment