Lardner v Bishop [2011] NSWLEC 1149
Compensation for alleged property damage was dismissed due to lack of causal link and evidence of serviceable life of structures. Orders to prune dead wood from the respondents' tree were made due to risk of injury under strong wind conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for compensation dismissed; orders to prune tree made.
- Legal Topics
- ['tree Disputes' 'damage to Property' 'injury to Persons' 'compensation' 'pruning Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the respondents' tree caused damage to the applicant's property" "Whether the respondents' tree presents a risk of injury to persons" 'Whether compensation is payable for damage to pool, shed, fence, and application expenses' 'Whether orders should be made regarding pruning of the tree']
Ratio Decidendi
Compensation for alleged property damage was dismissed due to lack of causal link and evidence of serviceable life of structures. Orders to prune dead wood from the respondents' tree were made due to risk of injury under strong wind conditions.
Court Disposition
Application for compensation dismissed; orders to prune tree made.
Orders
- ['Application for compensation in its entirety is dismissed.' 'Respondent to engage and pay for an AQF level 3 arborist with appropriate insurance to remove all dead wood down to 25 mm in diameter from the Bluegum tree.' 'Work to be carried out in accordance with AS4373 Pruning of Amenity Trees and NSW WorkCover...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment