Mr D v Ms P [2020] NSWCA 255

Mr D v Ms P [2020] NSWCA 255

A partial stay was appropriate because at least $300,000 of the judgment was undisputed and there was no reason to prevent Ms P enforcing that portion, while the challenged balance should be stayed only on conditions preserving Mr D's assets and requiring him to prosecute the appeal, given that the appeal was no more than arguable and Mr D needed access to bank funds to pay security for costs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 October 2020
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay of Primary Judgment Pending Appeal / Court of Appeal Notice of Motion for a Stay
Outcome
Partial stay granted on conditions; costs of the notice of motion for a stay were ordered to be costs in the appeal.
Legal Topics
['stay Pending Appeal' 'partial Stay' 'enforcement of Judgment' 'security for Costs' 'costs']
['civil Procedure' 'appeals'] ['stay Pending Appeal' 'partial Stay' 'enforcement of Judgment' 'security for Costs' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Stay of Primary Judgment Pending Appeal / Court of Appeal Notice of Motion for a Stay

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether orders made by Simpson AJ should be stayed under r 51.44(1) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) pending determination of the appeal.' 'Whether a stay should extend to an unchallenged portion of the monetary judgment.' "Whether the merits of the appeal and the appellant's asserted need to preserve funds for security for costs and appeal costs justified a stay."]

Ratio Decidendi

A partial stay was appropriate because at least $300,000 of the judgment was undisputed and there was no reason to prevent Ms P enforcing that portion, while the challenged balance should be stayed only on conditions preserving Mr D's assets and requiring him to prosecute the appeal, given that the appeal was no more than arguable and Mr D needed access to bank funds to pay security for costs.

Court Disposition

Partial stay granted on conditions; costs of the notice of motion for a stay were ordered to be costs in the appeal.

Orders

  • ['On the condition stated in order 3, order that the judgment of $979,550 ordered by Simpson AJ on 9 September 2020 be stayed to the extent of $679,550 of the judgment until determination of the appeal or further order.' 'On the condition stated in order 3, stay until determination of the appeal or further order the...