Sawires v Price [2022] NSWDC 390
As the plaintiff has not been released from the implied undertaking given in the Local Court regarding documents obtained under subpoena, and as his application for release was refused, he cannot lawfully proceed with the defamation claim based on that material. This constitutes an abuse of process. The proceedings are therefore permanently stayed and indemnity costs awarded to the defendant.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mr Emad Sawires; Defendant: Ms Christie Price
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Defamation / Hearing of Defendant's Application for Permanent Stay and Indemnity Costs
- Outcome
- Proceedings permanently stayed. Plaintiff to pay defendant's costs on an indemnity basis.
- Legal Topics
- Defamation, Abuse of Process, Use of Subpoenaed Documents, Implied Undertaking, Indemnity Costs, Permanent Stay
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Emad Sawires
Plaintiff
Ms Christie Price
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Defamation / Hearing of Defendant's Application for Permanent Stay and Indemnity Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proceedings for defamation can proceed based on documents obtained under subpoena without leave of the producing court
- 2 Whether the proceedings should be permanently stayed as an abuse of process
- 3 Whether indemnity costs should be awarded
Ratio Decidendi
As the plaintiff has not been released from the implied undertaking given in the Local Court regarding documents obtained under subpoena, and as his application for release was refused, he cannot lawfully proceed with the defamation claim based on that material. This constitutes an abuse of process. The proceedings are therefore permanently stayed and indemnity costs awarded to the defendant.
Court Disposition
Proceedings permanently stayed. Plaintiff to pay defendant's costs on an indemnity basis.
Orders
- Plaintiff did not contact or attend the court and was unsuccessfully contacted twice by telephone.
- Pursuant to s 67 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), these proceedings are permanently stayed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment