Danis v Oliveri Legal Pty Ltd (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 124

The appeal was allowed due to apprehended bias by the Magistrate, not due to any improper conduct by the defendants; as such, the actions leading to the costs order were a product of the Magistrate's conduct, not the defendants, making this an appropriate case for granting an indemnity certificate to the defendants.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 22 February 2023
Procedural Posture: Appeal / Costs Orders Following Successful Appeal
Outcome: Indemnity certificate granted to defendants pursuant to s 6 of Suitors' Fund Act, recommendation for broader reimbursement declined.
Legal Topics: ["suitors' Fund" 'indemnity Certificates' 'apprehended Bias' 'procedural Fairness' 'consequential Costs Orders']

['costs'] ["suitors' Fund" 'indemnity Certificates' 'apprehended Bias' 'procedural Fairness' 'consequential Costs Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Costs Orders Following Successful Appeal

Legal Issues

1 ["Whether defendants are eligible for an indemnity certificate under s 6 of the Suitors' Fund Act after appeal allowed on basis of apprehended bias" "Whether orders should extend to recommending reimbursement for both defendants' and plaintiff's appeal costs"]

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Indemnity certificate granted to defendants pursuant to s 6 of Suitors' Fund Act, recommendation for broader reimbursement declined.

Orders

["To the extent otherwise eligible, the Court grants an indemnity certificate to the defendants pursuant to s 6 of the Suitors' Fund Act."]