Singh & anor v Stanford [2014] NSWLEC 1014
Only three of the trees (Duranta erecta, trees 4, 5, and 6) formed a hedge as required under s 14A(1)(a). These trees severely obstructed views but not sunlight. The loss of view justified remedial orders, balanced with the respondent's privacy, but only to a height of 4m.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application upheld in part
- Legal Topics
- ['trees and Hedges' 'obstruction of Sunlight' 'obstruction of Views' 'neighbour Disputes']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the trees form a hedge within the meaning of s 14A(1)(a) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006' 'Whether the hedge severely obstructs sunlight to a window or views from a dwelling under s 14E(2)' 'Whether the balance of interests under s 14E(2)(b) and s 14F favours making an order']
Ratio Decidendi
Only three of the trees (Duranta erecta, trees 4, 5, and 6) formed a hedge as required under s 14A(1)(a). These trees severely obstructed views but not sunlight. The loss of view justified remedial orders, balanced with the respondent's privacy, but only to a height of 4m.
Court Disposition
Application upheld in part
Orders
- ['Within 30 days, respondent to prune trees 4, 5, and 6 (Duranta erecta) to a height of 4m above ground, at her cost.' 'Applicants to provide reasonable access for this work on two working days notice if required.' 'Pruning work to be carried out annually each February for the life of the plants.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment