Lawrence & Anor v Shaw & Anor [2013] NSWDC 91
The appeal was dismissed because no error of law was identified in the decision of the Costs Review Panel; the grounds raised by the appellants concerned merits or facts, not law. The Panel and Assessor had correctly applied the applicable legal principles regarding costs assessment and the indemnity rule.
- Parties
- First Appellant: Mr Wayne Lawrence; Second Appellant: Minsden Pty Ltd; Respondent: Mr James Shaw; Second Respondent: Lawrence Waterhouse Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Costs Review Panel Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Costs Assessment, Costs Review Panel, Gross Sum Costs Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Wayne Lawrence
First Appellant
Minsden Pty Ltd
Second Appellant
Mr James Shaw
Respondent
Lawrence Waterhouse Pty Ltd
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Costs Review Panel Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Costs Review Panel erred in law in affirming the assessment of costs
- 2 Application of the indemnity rule in costs assessment
- 3 Whether the panel failed to consider alleged errors in the costs assessment process
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because no error of law was identified in the decision of the Costs Review Panel; the grounds raised by the appellants concerned merits or facts, not law. The Panel and Assessor had correctly applied the applicable legal principles regarding costs assessment and the indemnity rule.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Appellants to pay the costs of the appeal of the respondents in the gross sum of $12,500 under s 98(4)(c) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment