Stasch v Darvodelsky [2011] NSWLEC 1173
Court found that only tree 2, Angophora costata, met the statutory test for likelihood of causing damage or injury near the applicant's property due to terminal dead wood. Orders for regular dead wood removal were appropriate to minimise risk. No orders were made for the other trees, inspections, or compensation.
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr K Stasch; Respondent: Mr P Darvodelsky
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Tree Dispute / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Application upheld in part
- Legal Topics
- Tree Disputes Between Neighbours, Potential Damage to Property, Personal Injury From Trees
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr K Stasch
Applicant
Mr P Darvodelsky
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Tree Dispute / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trees on the respondent's property are likely to cause damage to the applicant's property or injury to persons
- 2 Jurisdiction of the court under s 10(2) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
- 3 Appropriate orders for maintenance or removal of dead wood from trees
Ratio Decidendi
Court found that only tree 2, Angophora costata, met the statutory test for likelihood of causing damage or injury near the applicant's property due to terminal dead wood. Orders for regular dead wood removal were appropriate to minimise risk. No orders were made for the other trees, inspections, or compensation.
Court Disposition
Application upheld in part
Orders
- The respondent is to engage and pay for an AQF level 3 arborist to remove dead wood down to 20mm diameter from the canopy of the southern trunk of tree 2 (Angophora costata).
- The work is to be carried out in accordance with AS4373:2007 Pruning of Amenity Trees and the WorkCover NSW Code of Practice for the Amenity Tree Industry.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment