BKC [2016] NSWCATGD 71

BKC [2016] NSWCATGD 71

The Tribunal refused the application for consent to special medical treatment in respect of Mr BKC because the evidence established that Mr BKC is capable of providing consent on his own behalf to the administration of Cyproterone acetate, and thus the Tribunal is not able to provide consent on his behalf.

Parties
Subject Person: Mr BKC; Applicant: Mr KAQ; Guardian: NSW Public Guardian
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 April 2016
Procedural Posture
Application for Consent to Special Medical Treatment / Final Decision
Outcome
Application for consent to special medical treatment refused and dismissed.
Legal Topics
Special Medical Treatment, Capacity to Consent, Androcur, Intellectual Disability, Paedophilic Tendencies

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr BKC

Subject Person

Mr KAQ

Applicant

NSW Public Guardian

Guardian

Procedural Posture

Application for Consent to Special Medical Treatment / Final Decision

  1. 1 Whether Mr BKC is capable of providing consent to the administration of Cyproterone acetate (Androcur) as special medical treatment
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal should consent to the special medical treatment on behalf of Mr BKC

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal refused the application for consent to special medical treatment in respect of Mr BKC because the evidence established that Mr BKC is capable of providing consent on his own behalf to the administration of Cyproterone acetate, and thus the Tribunal is not able to provide consent on his behalf.

Court Disposition

Application for consent to special medical treatment refused and dismissed.

Orders

  • The application for consent to special medical treatment made by Mr KAQ in respect of Mr BKC is refused and therefore dismissed.