STANTON AND ORS v REIBELT AND ANOR [1998] NSWCA 214

STANTON AND ORS v REIBELT AND ANOR [1998] NSWCA 214

The trial judge's findings on breach, causation, and damages were supported by the evidence and in line with legal principle; the method of assessing damages was accepted; and indemnity costs should have been awarded after rejection of a reasonable settlement offer in view of the factual findings.

Parties
Appellant: Mr Laurence Stanton; Appellant: Mrs Sonia Stanton; Respondent: Mr and Mrs Reibelt
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 September 1998
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal and Cross Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal upheld.
Legal Topics
Non Competition Clause, Damages, Causation, Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Laurence Stanton

Appellant

Mrs Sonia Stanton

Appellant

Mr and Mrs Reibelt

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal and Cross Appeal

  1. 1 Whether appellants breached non-competition promise
  2. 2 Whether respondents suffered damage as a result of breach
  3. 3 Whether damages were correctly assessed

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge's findings on breach, causation, and damages were supported by the evidence and in line with legal principle; the method of assessing damages was accepted; and indemnity costs should have been awarded after rejection of a reasonable settlement offer in view of the factual findings.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal upheld.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; appellants to pay respondents' costs.
  • Cross-appeal upheld: cross-respondents to pay trial costs of respondents on a party and party basis to 16 April 1996 and on an indemnity basis thereafter; cross-respondents Mr L Stanton and Mrs S Stanton to pay respondents' costs of the cross-appeal.