Barnes v Surf Life Saving Illawarra Incorporated & Ors [2021] NSWDC 77
The costs order made on 17 August 2020 was varied, as the adjournment of the hearing was attributable to a lack of readiness caused by both sides and the non-disclosure of the plaintiff’s supplementary expert report contributed to a misapprehension forming the basis of the costs consent order. The defendants were granted leave to further amend their defences to plead a risk warning defence under s 5M of the Civil Liability Act, but required to provide particulars identifying the precise recreational activities and risks, both for the s 5L and s 5M defences. The plaintiff was entitled to particulars so as to understand and respond to the defendants’ statutory defences.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Decisions on Costs and Pleadings
- Outcome
- Applications granted in part; costs order varied; defendants permitted to further amend defences with required particulars.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs Orders' 'pleading Requirements' 'amendments to Defences' 'statutory Defences' 'personal Injury' 'recreational Activities' 'risk Warnings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Decisions on Costs and Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the costs order made by consent should be varied due to non-disclosure of a supplementary expert report' 'Whether the defendants are entitled to further amend their defences to add a risk warning defence under s 5M Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW)' 'Whether the plaintiff is entitled to particulars of the statutory defences pleaded under ss 5L and 5M Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW)']
Ratio Decidendi
The costs order made on 17 August 2020 was varied, as the adjournment of the hearing was attributable to a lack of readiness caused by both sides and the non-disclosure of the plaintiff’s supplementary expert report contributed to a misapprehension forming the basis of the costs consent order. The defendants were granted leave to further amend their defences to plead a risk warning defence under s 5M of the Civil Liability Act, but required to provide particulars identifying the precise recreational activities and risks, both for the s 5L and s 5M defences. The plaintiff was entitled to particulars so as to understand and respond to the defendants’ statutory defences.
Court Disposition
Applications granted in part; costs order varied; defendants permitted to further amend defences with required particulars.
Orders
- ['Order 8 of 17 August 2020 varied: defendants to pay plaintiff’s costs of the notice of motion filed 28 July 2020; parties to bear their own costs of the vacation of the August 2020 hearing.' 'Defendants given leave to file further amended defences by 26 March 2021 with particulars for s 5L and s 5M.' 'Plaintiff to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment