R v McNamara [2017] NSWLC 26
Withdrawal and deemed dismissal of proceedings pursuant to s 208 of the Criminal Procedure Act is the appropriate and sufficient outcome; there was no abuse of process in following the statutory regime. None of the exceptions to permit an order for costs under s 214(1) were established by the accused on the facts or law; costs refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Post Hearing Determination After Prosecution Withdrew Charges; Applications for Dismissal and Costs Considered
- Outcome
- Charges dismissed following withdrawal under s 208; applications for dismissal under s 205 and for costs refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['abuse of Process' 'dismissal of Charges' 'costs in Criminal Proceedings' 'summary Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Post Hearing Determination After Prosecution Withdrew Charges; Applications for Dismissal and Costs Considered
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether dismissal should be entered under s 205 or by deemed effect under s 208 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW)' 'Whether withdrawal under s 208 constitutes an abuse of process' 'Whether costs should be awarded to the accused under the exceptions set out in s 214(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW)']
Ratio Decidendi
Withdrawal and deemed dismissal of proceedings pursuant to s 208 of the Criminal Procedure Act is the appropriate and sufficient outcome; there was no abuse of process in following the statutory regime. None of the exceptions to permit an order for costs under s 214(1) were established by the accused on the facts or law; costs refused.
Court Disposition
Charges dismissed following withdrawal under s 208; applications for dismissal under s 205 and for costs refused.
Orders
- ['Application for order dismissing the proceedings pursuant to s 205 and for a certificate under s 205(2) refused.' 'Application for costs refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment