Rogers v Relf & anor [2016] NSWLEC 1018
While damage to property was established from branch failure, removal of Tree 1 is not warranted; appropriate remedy is selective removal of dangerous branches and regular pruning; compensation granted only for established insurance excess; no intervention for other trees due to lack of evidence of damage or connection to alleged injury.
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr M Rogers; Respondents: Mr C Relf and Ms D Smith
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted in part: removal of Tree 1 refused; compensation partially awarded; orders for selective pruning and maintenance of Tree 1.
- Legal Topics
- Tree Disputes, Compensation for Property Damage, Neighbourhood Nuisance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr M Rogers
Applicant
Mr C Relf and Ms D Smith
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trees have caused, are causing or are likely to cause damage to the applicant's property under s 10(2) of the Act
- 2 Whether compensation should be awarded for damage to property
- 3 Whether removal or pruning of the trees is warranted
Ratio Decidendi
While damage to property was established from branch failure, removal of Tree 1 is not warranted; appropriate remedy is selective removal of dangerous branches and regular pruning; compensation granted only for established insurance excess; no intervention for other trees due to lack of evidence of damage or connection to alleged injury.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part: removal of Tree 1 refused; compensation partially awarded; orders for selective pruning and maintenance of Tree 1.
Orders
- Application to remove Tree 1 is refused.
- Application for compensation is granted in part.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment