Mackey v Hunter Valley Gardens Pty Ltd [2019] NSWDC 150
The defendant failed to prove contributory negligence because it did not establish that the plaintiff knew or ought to have appreciated that the lightly drizzled tiles were slippery, failed to look where he was going, moved otherwise than normally towards the bathroom, or caused his injury by any want of reasonable care. The fall caused an undisputed left ankle fracture with continuing symptoms and was a necessary condition of consequential anxiety and depression, but the plaintiff did not prove that the later right knee condition or any shoulder injury was caused by the fall. Damages were therefore assessed for the left ankle injury, consequential mental harm, impaired earning capacity,...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Negligence Claim for Personal Injury Damages / Principal Judgment After Trial on Contributory Negligence, Causation and Assessment of Damages
- Outcome
- Contributory negligence defence failed; damages assessed for the plaintiff at $360,944 plus interest under s 18 of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) and costs, with final judgment sum to be provided by short minutes.
- Legal Topics
- ['contributory Negligence' 'slip and Fall on Wet Tile Paving' 'causation of Physical Injury and Consequential Mental Harm' 'non Economic Loss' 'past and Future Loss of Earning Capacity' 'past and Future Out of Pocket Expenses' 'future Domestic Assistance']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Negligence Claim for Personal Injury Damages / Principal Judgment After Trial on Contributory Negligence, Causation and Assessment of Damages
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the plaintiff's damages should be reduced for contributory negligence because he failed to take reasonable care when walking on wet tiles." 'What injuries and disabilities were caused by the fall, including whether the right knee injury, left shoulder injury and anxiety and depression were causally connected to the accident.' 'What amount of damages should be awarded for non-economic loss, past and future loss of earning capacity, past and future out-of-pocket expenses, and future domestic assistance.']
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant failed to prove contributory negligence because it did not establish that the plaintiff knew or ought to have appreciated that the lightly drizzled tiles were slippery, failed to look where he was going, moved otherwise than normally towards the bathroom, or caused his injury by any want of reasonable care. The fall caused an undisputed left ankle fracture with continuing symptoms and was a necessary condition of consequential anxiety and depression, but the plaintiff did not prove that the later right knee condition or any shoulder injury was caused by the fall. Damages were therefore assessed for the left ankle injury, consequential mental harm, impaired earning capacity,...
Court Disposition
Contributory negligence defence failed; damages assessed for the plaintiff at $360,944 plus interest under s 18 of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) and costs, with final judgment sum to be provided by short minutes.
Orders
- ['Damages assessed as: non-economic loss $88,900; past loss of earning capacity $50,000; future loss of earning capacity $180,000; past out-of-pocket expenses $575.49; future out-of-pocket expenses $6,375; future domestic assistance $35,094.' 'The assessed damages yield a sum of $360,944 to which interest calculated...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment