In the matter of Part IV Trustee Act 1925 [2017] NSWSC 1429
Due to the discrepancy in the spelling of Mr Priestley's surname and the significance of the amount in question, further clarification is required to establish his entitlement to the funds before payment can be ordered.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Interlocutory Hearing; Adjournment
- Outcome
- Adjourned for further hearing.
- Legal Topics
- ['unclaimed Funds' 'application Under UCPR R 41.10' 'payment Out of Court' 'verification of Identity']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Application / Interlocutory Hearing; Adjournment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Mr Murray William Priestley is entitled to payment out of moneys held in court as surplus from a mortgagee sale' 'Whether the identity of Mr Priestley as the mortgagor is adequately verified given discrepancies in name spelling']
Ratio Decidendi
Due to the discrepancy in the spelling of Mr Priestley's surname and the significance of the amount in question, further clarification is required to establish his entitlement to the funds before payment can be ordered.
Court Disposition
Adjourned for further hearing.
Orders
- ['The matter is adjourned for further hearing before Campbell J on 27 October 2017 at 9.30am.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment