In the matter of Part IV Trustee Act 1925 (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 1449
Based on the additional affidavit and relevant annexures, the court is satisfied that Mr Murray William Priestley is the person entitled to the fund, and orders payment out accordingly under r 41.11 UCPR 2005 (NSW).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Payment of Unclaimed Funds / Chambers Decision
- Outcome
- Application granted; payment out of fund ordered.
- Legal Topics
- ['unclaimed Funds' 'payment Out of Court' 'mortgagee Sale']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Application for Payment of Unclaimed Funds / Chambers Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant is entitled to payment of unclaimed funds paid into court as surplus proceeds of mortgagee sale']
Ratio Decidendi
Based on the additional affidavit and relevant annexures, the court is satisfied that Mr Murray William Priestley is the person entitled to the fund, and orders payment out accordingly under r 41.11 UCPR 2005 (NSW).
Court Disposition
Application granted; payment out of fund ordered.
Orders
- ['Under r 41.11 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), upon receipt of a duly signed authority, the whole of the fund paid into Court and interest thereon be paid out to Frank Mathey, solicitor for Murray William Priestley, who shall be liable to account to the applicant for the monies according to law.' 'Vacate...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment