Nguyen v Marrickville Municipal Council [1988] NSWLEC 114

Nguyen v Marrickville Municipal Council [1988] NSWLEC 114

There was no contrary indication in the context or subject matter of the Marrickville Planning Scheme Ordinance excluding the extended statutory meaning of "building". The workshop could therefore be treated as part of a building and as the relevant building for the definition of "home industry". Because the workshop floor space did not exceed 30 square metres, was within the curtilage of the dwelling-house, and was not itself a dwelling-house, the Applicant established entitlement to a suitably framed declaration that the proposed use was not prohibited on the floor-space ground raised by the Respondent.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 April 1988
Procedural Posture
Class 4 Proceedings / Judgment on Application for Declaration
Outcome
Applicant established entitlement to a suitably framed declaration; Applicant invited to bring in short minutes reflecting an appropriate form of order.
Legal Topics
['development Consent' 'home Industry' 'residential Zoning' 'statutory Interpretation' 'definition of Building' 'floor Space Limitation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Class 4 Proceedings / Judgment on Application for Declaration

  1. 1 ['Whether the Applicant\'s proposed use of a workshop for manufacturing clothing at 107 Railway Road, Sydenham was a use for a "home industry" within the meaning of the Marrickville Planning Scheme Ordinance.' 'Whether the workshop was "a building" that did not occupy a floor space exceeding 30 square metres for the purposes of paragraph (a) of the definition of "home industry".' 'Whether the statutory extended meaning of "building" in s.342B of the Local Government Act 1919 applied to the definition of "home industry".' 'Whether the workshop was disqualified because it was not physically separated from a dwelling-house.']

Ratio Decidendi

There was no contrary indication in the context or subject matter of the Marrickville Planning Scheme Ordinance excluding the extended statutory meaning of "building". The workshop could therefore be treated as part of a building and as the relevant building for the definition of "home industry". Because the workshop floor space did not exceed 30 square metres, was within the curtilage of the dwelling-house, and was not itself a dwelling-house, the Applicant established entitlement to a suitably framed declaration that the proposed use was not prohibited on the floor-space ground raised by the Respondent.

Court Disposition

Applicant established entitlement to a suitably framed declaration; Applicant invited to bring in short minutes reflecting an appropriate form of order.

Orders

  • ["Applicant is invited to bring in short minutes reflecting an appropriate form of Order giving effect to the Court's determination of the only issue raised in the proceedings."]