McArthur v Miernik [2011] NSWLEC 1359
Vegetation (including bamboo) on the respondent's property caused damage to the dividing fence, satisfying s 10(2) of the Act; Court jurisdiction enlivened. The Camphor Laurel does not pose a near-future risk; no order may be made for that tree. Orders granted for partial fence replacement and bamboo removal.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application upheld in part
- Legal Topics
- ['trees and Neighbours' 'damage to Property' 'dividing Fences']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether trees and bamboo growing on the respondent's property caused damage to the dividing fence" "Whether the Camphor Laurel posed a risk of future damage to the applicant's property" 'Extent of damage and responsibility for repair costs']
Ratio Decidendi
Vegetation (including bamboo) on the respondent's property caused damage to the dividing fence, satisfying s 10(2) of the Act; Court jurisdiction enlivened. The Camphor Laurel does not pose a near-future risk; no order may be made for that tree. Orders granted for partial fence replacement and bamboo removal.
Court Disposition
Application upheld in part
Orders
- ['Application in respect of the Camphor Laurel dismissed.' 'Application in respect of the fence upheld in part.' 'Respondent to remove all bamboo within 1m of the dividing fence by end of January 2012.' 'Respondent and applicant to obtain quotes from licensed fencing contractors for replacement of four panels (9.5m)...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment