RATCLIFFE and ANOR v OCEANIC LIFE LTD [1998] NSWCA 180
The assignment from Permanent to Oceanic was legally effective and Mr Ratcliffe and Mr Tuck remained bound by the guarantee, which had also been validly assigned; there is no warrant for disregarding the form documented by the parties.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Ratcliffe; Appellant: Mr Tuck; Respondent: Oceanic Life Ltd; Mortgagor: Glowtide Pty Ltd; Assignor: Permanent Trustee Company Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment of the Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Assignment of Debt, Guarantee Liability, Mortgage Security, Stamp Duty Minimisation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Ratcliffe
Appellant
Mr Tuck
Appellant
Oceanic Life Ltd
Respondent
Glowtide Pty Ltd
Mortgagor
Permanent Trustee Company Ltd
Assignor
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment of the Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether assignment of the benefit of a guarantee is legally effective so that guarantors become bound to the assignee
- 2 Whether the parties’ form of contract for refinancing is legally effective according to its tenor
Ratio Decidendi
The assignment from Permanent to Oceanic was legally effective and Mr Ratcliffe and Mr Tuck remained bound by the guarantee, which had also been validly assigned; there is no warrant for disregarding the form documented by the parties.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment