MORRISON and ANOR v JUDD [1995] NSWCA 300
Errors identified by Spender AJ did not warrant overturning the Master's discretionary decision. The Master's consideration of a possible claim against solicitors was relevant but of little weight, and proper weight was given to prejudice due to delay. Therefore, the Judge's orders are set aside and the Master's orders restored.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Robert Morrison; Appellant: Mr Ronald Brown; Respondent: Ms Andrea Judd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Prejudice Due to Delay, Discretionary Appellate Review, Negligence by Solicitors, Obligation to Advise Client, Conflict of Interest
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Robert Morrison
Appellant
Mr Ronald Brown
Appellant
Ms Andrea Judd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in granting leave to serve a statement of claim out of time
- 2 Weight to be given to availability of a claim against negligent solicitors
- 3 Proper consideration of prejudice resulting from delay (death of eyewitness, loss of evidence)
Ratio Decidendi
Errors identified by Spender AJ did not warrant overturning the Master's discretionary decision. The Master's consideration of a possible claim against solicitors was relevant but of little weight, and proper weight was given to prejudice due to delay. Therefore, the Judge's orders are set aside and the Master's orders restored.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted
- Appeal allowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment