Danwer v Corrective Services NSW [2012] NSWIRComm 1024
The appellant's suspension without pay was not a disciplinary decision of punishment under section 97; it was a protective measure pending the outcome of criminal proceedings, and no finding of misconduct or contravention was made by the respondent. Consequently, the appeal does not invoke the Commission’s jurisdiction and must be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 September 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Disciplinary Appeal / Hearing of Notice of Motion to Strike Out Appeal for Want of Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Notice of Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
- Legal Topics
- ['disciplinary Appeals' 'suspension of Public Sector Employees' 'jurisdiction' 'procedural Time Limits']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Disciplinary Appeal / Hearing of Notice of Motion to Strike Out Appeal for Want of Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Notice of Appeal was filed within the statutory time limit' 'Whether the decision to suspend without pay constitutes a disciplinary decision for appeal under section 97 of the Industrial Relations Act, 1996']
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant's suspension without pay was not a disciplinary decision of punishment under section 97; it was a protective measure pending the outcome of criminal proceedings, and no finding of misconduct or contravention was made by the respondent. Consequently, the appeal does not invoke the Commission’s jurisdiction and must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Notice of Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Orders
- ['The Notice of Appeal-Public Sector Discipline is dismissed.' 'This matter is now concluded.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment