Drmota v Vujic [2011] NSWLEC 1317
There is insufficient evidence that the tree is likely to fail or cause significant damage or injury in the near future. Removal on the basis of a single fallen branch or trunk wound would be disproportionate. Pruning to remove dead wood and a hanging branch is a more appropriate response.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under the Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for removal of the tree dismissed; pruning orders made.
- Legal Topics
- ['tree Disputes' 'future Property Damage' 'potential Injury to Persons']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under the Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the subject tree is likely in the near future to cause property damage or personal injury' 'Whether the tree should be removed or pruned under the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006']
Ratio Decidendi
There is insufficient evidence that the tree is likely to fail or cause significant damage or injury in the near future. Removal on the basis of a single fallen branch or trunk wound would be disproportionate. Pruning to remove dead wood and a hanging branch is a more appropriate response.
Court Disposition
Application for removal of the tree dismissed; pruning orders made.
Orders
- ['Application to remove tree dismissed.' "Respondents to engage and pay for an AQF level 3 arborist to remove dead wood down to 70mm in diameter at its base from all parts of the tree that overhang the applicant's property to a distance of 3m inside the respondents' property. All hanging branches are to be removed."...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment