Shi v Zhong (No.2) [2021] NSWDC 466
A gross sum costs order is appropriate given the unchallenged evidence of costs, lack of response from the defendant, and circumstances that would make costs assessment impractical. Interest should be awarded as calculated on instalments as they became due, according to Practice Note District Court (Civil) No. 15....
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 September 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Variation of Previous Orders Relating to Interest and Costs, Following Prior Judgment
- Outcome
- Orders varied to award additional interest and gross sum costs; in favour of the plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'interest' 'gross Sum Costs Order' 'offer of Compromise']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Variation of Previous Orders Relating to Interest and Costs, Following Prior Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a gross sum costs order should be made under s 98(4) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)' 'Whether interest should be awarded and how it should be calculated' 'Entitlement to indemnity costs following non-acceptance of an offer of compromise']
Ratio Decidendi
A gross sum costs order is appropriate given the unchallenged evidence of costs, lack of response from the defendant, and circumstances that would make costs assessment impractical. Interest should be awarded as calculated on instalments as they became due, according to Practice Note District Court (Civil) No. 15. Indemnity costs are justified from expiry of an unaccepted offer of compromise as the judgment was substantially more favourable to the plaintiff.
Court Disposition
Orders varied to award additional interest and gross sum costs; in favour of the plaintiff.
Orders
- ['Order 1 of 17 August 2021 varied to include interest of $22,273.91, making total judgment sum $246,521.69' "Order 2 of 17 August 2021 varied to require the defendant to pay plaintiff's costs in the gross sum of $19,930.36"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment