BRADBURY v AUSTRALIAN GUARANTEE CORPORATION LTD and ORS [1997] NSWCA 47

BRADBURY v AUSTRALIAN GUARANTEE CORPORATION LTD and ORS [1997] NSWCA 47

There was no unconscionable conduct by AGC, Mrs Bradbury was aware of the nature of the documents she signed, no relevant disability existed, and the circumstances did not justify relief under the Contracts Review Act 1980. AGC did not owe nor assume any duty to provide commercial advice.

Parties
Appellant: Mrs Bradbury; First Respondent: Australian Guarantee Corporation Ltd (AGC); Company for Which Appellant Guaranteed Liabilities: International Rigging (Aust) Pty Ltd (IRA)
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 July 1997
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Guarantee, Unconscionable Conduct, Assignment of Shares, Relief Under Contracts Review Act 1980

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mrs Bradbury

Appellant

Australian Guarantee Corporation Ltd (AGC)

First Respondent

International Rigging (Aust) Pty Ltd (IRA)

Company for Which Appellant Guaranteed Liabilities

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether there was unconscionable conduct by AGC.
  2. 2 Whether AGC breached any duty of care to Mrs Bradbury.
  3. 3 Whether the Contracts Review Act 1980 provides relief to Mrs Bradbury on grounds of disability or extraordinary circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

There was no unconscionable conduct by AGC, Mrs Bradbury was aware of the nature of the documents she signed, no relevant disability existed, and the circumstances did not justify relief under the Contracts Review Act 1980. AGC did not owe nor assume any duty to provide commercial advice.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs
  • As against Mrs Bradbury, AGC entitled to vacant possession of the Units