McLeod & anor v Bruce [2010] NSWLEC 1322
There was insufficient evidence that the tree had caused, was causing, or was likely in the near future to cause damage to the applicants' property or likely injury to persons. Any contribution by the tree to the fence condition was very minor and did not warrant intervention, there was no evidence of likely near-future root damage to the path or house, and leaf fall did not justify orders for removal or gutter-cleaning contribution.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Application Pursuant to Part 2 S 7 of the Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Ex Tempore Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['damage to Property' 'risk of Injury to Persons' 'tree Removal' 'dividing Fence' 'gutter Cleaning']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Pursuant to Part 2 S 7 of the Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Ex Tempore Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the tree has caused, is causing, or is likely in the near future to cause damage to the applicants' property." 'Whether the tree is likely to cause injury to any person.' 'Whether the Court should order removal of the tree, replacement of the fence, or cleaning of the guttering.']
Ratio Decidendi
There was insufficient evidence that the tree had caused, was causing, or was likely in the near future to cause damage to the applicants' property or likely injury to persons. Any contribution by the tree to the fence condition was very minor and did not warrant intervention, there was no evidence of likely near-future root damage to the path or house, and leaf fall did not justify orders for removal or gutter-cleaning contribution.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment