COHEN v McWILLIAM [1995] NSWCA 82
The orders may be amended before entry to include an undertaking as a condition, mirroring the position that would have applied had leave to amend the defence been granted at first instance, ensuring fairness to both sides given the procedural posture.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mrs Cohen; Respondent: McWilliam
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion (post Appeal) / Post Appeal Orders (modification of Orders Prior to Entry)
- Outcome
- Orders varied as sought in the Notice of Motion, with undertaking required as a condition; costs of the application to be part of the costs of the appeal payable by the respondents, with potential qualification for a certificate under the Suitors Fund Act.
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Defence, Undertaking as to Property, Security for Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Cohen
Appellant
McWilliam
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion (post Appeal) / Post Appeal Orders (modification of Orders Prior to Entry)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an undertaking to the court regarding property should continue post-appeal
- 2 Whether orders should be amended to condition relief on the giving of an undertaking
Ratio Decidendi
The orders may be amended before entry to include an undertaking as a condition, mirroring the position that would have applied had leave to amend the defence been granted at first instance, ensuring fairness to both sides given the procedural posture.
Court Disposition
Orders varied as sought in the Notice of Motion, with undertaking required as a condition; costs of the application to be part of the costs of the appeal payable by the respondents, with potential qualification for a certificate under the Suitors Fund Act.
Orders
- Orders to include the condition that Mrs Cohen gives an amended undertaking as set out (and initialled) on the schedule to the Notice of Motion.
- The costs of today's application are to be part of the costs of the appeal which the respondents are to pay; if qualified, respondents may have a certificate under the Suitors Fund Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment