Woods v White & anor [2014] NSWLEC 1012
The Court found sufficient evidence that roots from respondents' Metasequoia tree caused damage to the applicant's property, activating jurisdiction under s 10(2). The Court exercised its discretion to grant partial relief: respondents to pay 80% of rectification works as specified, with remainder by applicant, based on the cause, circumstances, and actions of both parties.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Tree Dispute / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application upheld in part
- Legal Topics
- ['trees and Neighbours' 'damage to Property' 'remedies and Compensation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Tree Dispute / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the roots of the respondents' tree caused damage to the applicant's property" 'Whether compensation or rectification is appropriate under the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006' 'Whether discretionary matters under s 12 of the Act affect the relief granted']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found sufficient evidence that roots from respondents' Metasequoia tree caused damage to the applicant's property, activating jurisdiction under s 10(2). The Court exercised its discretion to grant partial relief: respondents to pay 80% of rectification works as specified, with remainder by applicant, based on the cause, circumstances, and actions of both parties.
Court Disposition
Application upheld in part
Orders
- ['Each party to obtain at least two quotes for specified works by 28 February 2014' 'Applicant to provide reasonable access for quoting' 'Parties to exchange quotes by 7 March 2014 and agree on contractor, or select cheapest quote if no agreement' 'Applicant to engage and pay for selected contractor' 'Works to be...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment