FORREST V. SCOTT

FORREST V. SCOTT

The High Court held that the term 'earnings' as used in the defendant’s letter referred to gross receipts, not profits, and found no breach of warranty regarding earnings. Any breach regarding carting charges did not result in provable damage. The Full Court's decision to set aside damages and dismiss the appeal was correct.

Parties
Appellant: Mrs. Forrest; Respondent: Scott
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 November 1948
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court Judgment on Appeal From Full Court
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Warranty, Deceit, Interpretation of Contractual Terms
Contract Law Misrepresentation Warranty Deceit Interpretation of Contractual Terms

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mrs. Forrest

Appellant

Scott

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / High Court Judgment on Appeal From Full Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether statements as to earnings and charges constituted warranties or mere representations
  2. 2 Interpretation of 'earnings'—whether gross receipts or profits
  3. 3 Whether judgment for damages for breach of warranty was properly set aside

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court held that the term 'earnings' as used in the defendant’s letter referred to gross receipts, not profits, and found no breach of warranty regarding earnings. Any breach regarding carting charges did not result in provable damage. The Full Court's decision to set aside damages and dismiss the appeal was correct.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs.
  • No new trial on issue of damages for breach of warranty.