Clemson v Freeburn [2010] NSWLEC 1298
The roots of Tree 1 have caused damage to the applicant's property; Tree 2's canopy could cause damage; Tree 3 has lifted paving, meeting the statutory criteria for orders under the Act. Appropriate orders by consent were made for rectification, pruning, compensation, and shared responsibility for works.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Consent Orders After Hearing
- Outcome
- Application upheld in part by consent orders.
- Legal Topics
- ['tree Disputes' 'neighbour Disputes' 'damage to Property' 'injury to Persons' 'consent Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Consent Orders After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the trees on the respondent's property have caused damage to the applicant's property or pose a risk of injury to persons under the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006." 'What remedial or preventive orders are appropriate in relation to the trees identified.']
Ratio Decidendi
The roots of Tree 1 have caused damage to the applicant's property; Tree 2's canopy could cause damage; Tree 3 has lifted paving, meeting the statutory criteria for orders under the Act. Appropriate orders by consent were made for rectification, pruning, compensation, and shared responsibility for works.
Court Disposition
Application upheld in part by consent orders.
Orders
- ['Respondent to pay applicant $1,500.00 within 14 days.' 'Applicant to undertake rectification work to front garden bed, including severing exposed roots, application of Root Guard, rectification or replacement of driveway and pathway.' 'Respondent to provide skip bin upon request for debris disposal.' 'Parties to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment