JEFFREY v MARSHALL and ANOR [1995] NSWCA 220
The trial judge erred in awarding only $7,500 for past and future economic loss given the unchallenged evidence of incapacity and lost earnings; accordingly, the appeal should be upheld and judgment for the appellant set at $40,967, appropriately accounting for the statutory deduction of compensation received.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mrs Jeffery; Respondent: Marshall
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; new judgment entered for appellant
- Legal Topics
- General Damages, Economic Loss, Motor Vehicle Accident, Transport Accidents Compensation Act 1987, Motor Accidents Act 1988
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Jeffery
Appellant
Marshall
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the damages awarded for general damages, past economic loss, and future economic loss were adequate given the circumstances of Mrs Jeffery's injury and employment loss.
- 2 Whether Taylor DCJ erred in finding the extent of disability and quantifying damages, in particular the application of statutory deductions for compensation received.
- 3 Appropriateness of substituting a different judgment sum on appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge erred in awarding only $7,500 for past and future economic loss given the unchallenged evidence of incapacity and lost earnings; accordingly, the appeal should be upheld and judgment for the appellant set at $40,967, appropriately accounting for the statutory deduction of compensation received.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; new judgment entered for appellant
Orders
- Appeal upheld.
- Judgment entered by Taylor DCJ on 23 April 1993 set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment