Peck v Matar [2012] NSWLEC 1037
Roots from the respondent's fig trees have contributed to damage to the applicant's property. Orders are appropriate for removal of roots and repair of damage to the WC wall, but not for replacement or repair of other aging property elements; both parties share costs relative to repair of WC wall.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Class 2 / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Orders for root removal and repairs made. Compensation awarded for WC wall repair; claims about garden steps, concrete slabs, pathways, and pipes dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['trees (disputes Between Neighbours)' 'damage to Property' 'compensation for Repair Works']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 2 / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether roots from the respondent's trees caused damage to the applicant's property" 'Appropriate orders regarding compensation and removal of roots']
Ratio Decidendi
Roots from the respondent's fig trees have contributed to damage to the applicant's property. Orders are appropriate for removal of roots and repair of damage to the WC wall, but not for replacement or repair of other aging property elements; both parties share costs relative to repair of WC wall.
Court Disposition
Orders for root removal and repairs made. Compensation awarded for WC wall repair; claims about garden steps, concrete slabs, pathways, and pipes dismissed.
Orders
- ['Applicant to engage and pay for a qualified horticulturist or arborist to cut boundary roots within 30 days; roots not to be poisoned.' 'Applicant and respondent to provide two quotes each within 30 days to make good or repair the WC wall.' 'Applicant to provide access for tradespeople chosen by the respondent.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment