Sinclair v Rowney [2013] NSWLEC 1044
Sufficient evidence established that roots from respondent's Leyland Cypress trees have blocked applicant's sewer, fulfilling s 10(2) and engaging Court's jurisdiction; only one tree demonstrated risk of falling and causing damage or injury, warranting its removal.
- Parties
- Applicant: Mrs P Sinclair; Respondent: Mr T Rowney; Respondent: BCP Lawyers and Consultants
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Class 2 / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Application upheld in part
- Legal Topics
- Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006, Damage to Property, Blocking of Sewer, Potential Injury, Unstable Tree
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs P Sinclair
Applicant
Mr T Rowney
Respondent
BCP Lawyers and Consultants
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 2 / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Leyland Cypress tree roots are causing or likely to cause damage to applicant's property by blocking sewer pipes.
- 2 Whether any trees are likely to cause injury or damage by falling.
- 3 Whether pruning or removal of trees is warranted under the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006.
Ratio Decidendi
Sufficient evidence established that roots from respondent's Leyland Cypress trees have blocked applicant's sewer, fulfilling s 10(2) and engaging Court's jurisdiction; only one tree demonstrated risk of falling and causing damage or injury, warranting its removal.
Court Disposition
Application upheld in part
Orders
- Respondent to remove the identified unstable tree (easternmost tree of northern row) by 30 April 2013.
- Respondent to straighten two fence panels adjacent to the removed tree.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment