Trnka v Deans [2011] NSWLEC 1056
There was no evidence of instability or significant likelihood of tree failure that would cause injury to persons inside the building or in the rear garden. Accordingly, the tree is not likely to cause injury as required under the Act, so no order can be made.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['trees (disputes Between Neighbours)' 'injury to Persons']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Paperbark tree is likely to cause injury to any person justifying an order for removal under s 7 and s 10(2)(b) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no evidence of instability or significant likelihood of tree failure that would cause injury to persons inside the building or in the rear garden. Accordingly, the tree is not likely to cause injury as required under the Act, so no order can be made.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['No order for removal of the Paperbark tree. Application dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment