Daley v Reid & anor; Flanagan v Reid & anor [2013] NSWLEC 1031
The Court found that the bamboo could be considered a hedge, thereby passing the first jurisdictional test. However, upon site inspection and review of evidence, it was determined that neither applicant suffered a severe obstruction of their views as required by the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006. Therefore, the Court did not have jurisdiction to make the orders sought, and both applications were dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 February 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Final Decision After Hearing
- Outcome
- Applications dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['tree Disputes' 'obstruction of Views' 'neighbourhood Disputes' 'jurisdictional Tests']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Final Decision After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the trees form a hedge for the purposes of the Act' 'Whether the trees severely obstruct views from the applicants’ dwellings' 'Whether the Court has jurisdiction to make the orders sought']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the bamboo could be considered a hedge, thereby passing the first jurisdictional test. However, upon site inspection and review of evidence, it was determined that neither applicant suffered a severe obstruction of their views as required by the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006. Therefore, the Court did not have jurisdiction to make the orders sought, and both applications were dismissed.
Court Disposition
Applications dismissed
Orders
- ['Application 21157 of 2012 is dismissed.' 'Application 21158 of 2012 is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment