Gorman & McCord [2008] NSWIRComm 1038
The Commission found that the reasons alleged for the applicant's termination were not based on fact, procedural fairness was not observed, and the dismissal was harsh, unjust, and unreasonable. The respondent failed to prove allegations of misconduct and did not give the applicant a fair opportunity to respond to...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Ms Kim Gorman; Respondent: Sarah McCord
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Unfair Dismissal / Decision
- Outcome
- Application upheld. Compensation awarded.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Procedural Fairness, Employment Termination, Compensation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms Kim Gorman
Applicant
Sarah McCord
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Unfair Dismissal / Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the dismissal of the applicant was harsh, unjust or unreasonable under s84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996
- 2 Whether the reasons given for the termination were based on fact
- 3 Whether procedural fairness was accorded to the applicant
Ratio Decidendi
The Commission found that the reasons alleged for the applicant's termination were not based on fact, procedural fairness was not observed, and the dismissal was harsh, unjust, and unreasonable. The respondent failed to prove allegations of misconduct and did not give the applicant a fair opportunity to respond to issues prior to termination.
Court Disposition
Application upheld. Compensation awarded.
Orders
- The respondent Ms Sarah Lynette McCord is to pay to the applicant Ms Kim Louise Gorman the sum of ten thousand dollars ($10,000).
- This payment must be paid to Ms Gorman within 28 days of the date of this Decision.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment