Burgess v Varlow [2015] NSWLEC 1457
The evidence of actual damage is insufficient to satisfy the jurisdictional test under s 10(2) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 for making orders. Leaf drop, as accepted in Tree Dispute Principle, generally does not warrant intervention, and the risk of fire from leaf accumulation is not engaged under the Act in these circumstances.
- Parties
- Applicant: Ms L Burgess; Respondent: Mr R Varlow
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Tree Dispute Application / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Tree Disputes, Damage to Property, Neighbourhood Disputes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms L Burgess
Applicant
Mr R Varlow
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Tree Dispute Application / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Melaleuca bracteata tree has caused, is causing or is likely in the near future to cause damage to the applicant's property under s 10(2) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
- 2 Whether leaf drop constitutes sufficient damage or risk of injury to warrant intervention under the Act
- 3 Whether the risk of fire from leaf accumulation engages provisions of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence of actual damage is insufficient to satisfy the jurisdictional test under s 10(2) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 for making orders. Leaf drop, as accepted in Tree Dispute Principle, generally does not warrant intervention, and the risk of fire from leaf accumulation is not engaged under the Act in these circumstances.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment