Hetherington-Gregory v All Vehicle Services (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 257

Application for referral to Pro Bono Panel dismissed as it does not appear that there are reasonable prospects of success in the proceedings, and it is not in the interests of justice to impose an obligation on the legal profession in this case.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 06 August 2012
Procedural Posture: Application for Referral to Pro Bono Panel / Court of Appeal Decision
Outcome: Application for referral to the Pro Bono Panel dismissed
Legal Topics: ['pro Bono Referral' 'representation of Parties' 'interests of Justice' 'reasonable Prospects of Success']

['civil Procedure'] ['pro Bono Referral' 'representation of Parties' 'interests of Justice' 'reasonable Prospects of Success']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Application for Referral to Pro Bono Panel / Court of Appeal Decision

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether it is in the interests of justice to refer applicant to Pro Bono Panel' 'Whether substantive matter has reasonable prospects of success']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application for referral to the Pro Bono Panel dismissed

Orders

['The application for referral to the Pro Bono Panel is dismissed.' 'No order as to costs of the hearing.']