Webster v Strang; Steiner v Strang [2018] NSWSC 495

Webster v Strang; Steiner v Strang [2018] NSWSC 495

The court found the executors succeeded in their cross-claim, concluding John Steiner was indebted to the estate in the sum of $881,000 by way of debt on an account stated, evidenced by the Acknowledgement document. The inference of indebtedness was not rebutted, and both John and Dorothy understood the arrangement as a loan. The alternative claim for moneys had and received and estoppel by convention failed. However, the court held that the will did not make adequate provision for John and Robyn’s maintenance and advancement in life, given their significant needs, limited capacity, their relationship with Dorothy, and the estate’s resources, warranting family provision orders for each.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 April 2018
Procedural Posture
Principal Judgment / Final Decision After Retrial; Family Provision and Cross Claim
Outcome
Additional provision ordered for John and Robyn; cross-claim for debt on account stated upheld against John
Legal Topics
['family Provision' 'account Stated' 'money Had and Received' 'estoppel by Convention' 'testamentary Disposition' 'loans and Gifts' 'adult Children Claims']
['succession Law' 'equity' 'contract'] ['family Provision' 'account Stated' 'money Had and Received' 'estoppel by Convention' 'testamentary Disposition' 'loans and Gifts' 'adult Children Claims']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Principal Judgment / Final Decision After Retrial; Family Provision and Cross Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether further provision should be made from the estate for adult children under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW)' 'Whether $881,000 advanced to John Steiner was a loan or a gift to be repaid to the estate' 'Whether the executors could offset the debt against entitlements under the will' 'Whether estoppel by convention or moneys had and received provided a basis for the cross-claim']

Ratio Decidendi

The court found the executors succeeded in their cross-claim, concluding John Steiner was indebted to the estate in the sum of $881,000 by way of debt on an account stated, evidenced by the Acknowledgement document. The inference of indebtedness was not rebutted, and both John and Dorothy understood the arrangement as a loan. The alternative claim for moneys had and received and estoppel by convention failed. However, the court held that the will did not make adequate provision for John and Robyn’s maintenance and advancement in life, given their significant needs, limited capacity, their relationship with Dorothy, and the estate’s resources, warranting family provision orders for each.

Court Disposition

Additional provision ordered for John and Robyn; cross-claim for debt on account stated upheld against John

Orders

  • ['Order that John Steiner is liable to the estate for $881,000 as debt on account stated, to be offset against entitlements under the will; loan is forgiven for family provision purposes' 'Order that Robyn Webster receives further provision of $1.2 million in addition to her $2 million legacy, to be drawn first from...