An application under s 218 of the Industrial Relations Act 1988 by Ms S Baillie for an inquiry in relation to an election for offices in the Automotive Food Metals & Engineering Union, Vehicle Division, Victorian Region & An application by Ms G Tierney for a declaration under s 260 of the Act & An application by Ms S Baillie for a declaration under s 257 of the Act [1995] IRCA 560
Ms Tierney was not eligible for membership of the VBEF or AFMEU under their rules at the time of her purported admission, and s.256 does not cure ineligibility for membership; however, from 5 December 1994 Ms Tierney became eligible for membership of the AFMEU and, under s.260, is entitled to be admitted and treated as a member as though she had been one throughout her period of acting in good faith and being treated as such by the AFMEU, i.e. from 8 February 1993. Nevertheless, she was not a member for the required 3 years prior to nomination, so her nomination and election were invalid and constituted an electoral irregularity.
- Parties
- Applicant: Ms S Baillie; Respondent: Ms Gayle Tierney; Respondent: Automotive Food Metals & Engineering Union (AFMEU)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Inquiry and Declarations Under Statute (industrial Relations Act 1988) / Reasons for Judgment After Final Hearing, Further Orders to Be Made After Parties' Submissions
- Outcome
- Court found an irregularity in nomination and election, declared Ms Tierney not validly nominated or elected; no final orders made pending further submissions.
- Legal Topics
- Union Membership, Union Elections, Statutory Interpretation, Amalgamation of Unions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms S Baillie
Applicant
Ms Gayle Tierney
Respondent
Automotive Food Metals & Engineering Union (AFMEU)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Inquiry and Declarations Under Statute (industrial Relations Act 1988) / Reasons for Judgment After Final Hearing, Further Orders to Be Made After Parties' Submissions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Ms Gayle Tierney was eligible for membership of the VBEF and AFMEU under their rules
- 2 Whether the Secretary's act in enrolling Ms Tierney was validated by s.256 of the Industrial Relations Act 1988
- 3 Whether Ms Tierney is entitled to be treated as a member by operation of s.260 of the Act and thus eligible for nomination and election to union office
Ratio Decidendi
Ms Tierney was not eligible for membership of the VBEF or AFMEU under their rules at the time of her purported admission, and s.256 does not cure ineligibility for membership; however, from 5 December 1994 Ms Tierney became eligible for membership of the AFMEU and, under s.260, is entitled to be admitted and treated as a member as though she had been one throughout her period of acting in good faith and being treated as such by the AFMEU, i.e. from 8 February 1993. Nevertheless, she was not a member for the required 3 years prior to nomination, so her nomination and election were invalid and constituted an electoral irregularity.
Court Disposition
Court found an irregularity in nomination and election, declared Ms Tierney not validly nominated or elected; no final orders made pending further submissions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment