Tanya McGarry v Hunters Hill Council [2016] NSWLEC 1049
An agreement was reached between the parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions; therefore the proceedings were to be disposed of in accordance with that agreement, without a merits assessment of the issues originally in dispute.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Application / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Between the Parties; Final Orders
- Outcome
- Proceedings disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'alterations and Additions to Existing Dwelling' 'height' 'landscaped Area' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Application / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Between the Parties; Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 should be given effect by orders of the Court."]
Ratio Decidendi
An agreement was reached between the parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions; therefore the proceedings were to be disposed of in accordance with that agreement, without a merits assessment of the issues originally in dispute.
Court Disposition
Proceedings disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Orders
- ["Final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement were made on 09 February 2016."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment