MSAS Customs Brokerage Pty Ltd & Ors v Woodward, Lionel, Chief Executive Officer of Customs [1998] FCA 114
A request for a statement of reasons under s 13 of the ADJR Act must be made within twenty-eight days after provision of the decision in writing; as the applicants' request was made out of time and the decision-maker was not required to inform them of their rights, no duty arose to provide statements, and the application was dismissed.
- Parties
- Applicant: MSAS Customs Brokerage Pty Ltd; Applicant: Incitec Ltd; Applicant: GEC Alsthom Pty Ltd; Applicant: Web Dynamics Pty Ltd; Applicant: Holden's Motor Overseas Corporation Ltd; First Respondent: Lionel Woodward, Chief Executive Officer of Customs; Second Respondent: Richard Janeczko; Third Respondent: Marion Grant
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Time Limits for Requesting Reasons, Mandamus, Estoppel in Administrative Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MSAS Customs Brokerage Pty Ltd
Applicant
Incitec Ltd
Applicant
GEC Alsthom Pty Ltd
Applicant
Web Dynamics Pty Ltd
Applicant
Holden's Motor Overseas Corporation Ltd
Applicant
Lionel Woodward, Chief Executive Officer of Customs
First Respondent
Richard Janeczko
Second Respondent
Marion Grant
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a duty to provide a statement of reasons under s 13 of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 was enlivened despite the request being out of time
- 2 Whether failure to advise the applicants of their ADJR Act rights affected the finality of the decisions
- 3 Whether estoppel could prevent denial of a review
Ratio Decidendi
A request for a statement of reasons under s 13 of the ADJR Act must be made within twenty-eight days after provision of the decision in writing; as the applicants' request was made out of time and the decision-maker was not required to inform them of their rights, no duty arose to provide statements, and the application was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment