Mt Hercules Pastoral Co v Cootamundra Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 282
The amended proposal for a 975 head feedlot meets or exceeds the applicable planning controls and guidelines, including separation distances for odour and wastewater, and satisfactory measures are proposed to address all identified impacts. Subject to detailed conditions, the application merits conditional development consent.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Development Appeal / Merits Appeal and Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld. Development consent granted subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'feedlot Approval' 'noise' 'odour' 'water Pollution' 'public Interest' 'planning Controls' 'salinity' 'visual Impact' 'traffic']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Appeal / Merits Appeal and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether conditional development consent should be granted for a 975 head cattle feedlot on rural property' 'Adequacy of odour, noise, and wastewater controls' 'Compliance with planning instruments and guidelines, including SEPP 30 and NSW Feedlot Manual' 'Impact on social/community amenity, watercourses, visual amenity, flora and fauna, and public interest considerations']
Ratio Decidendi
The amended proposal for a 975 head feedlot meets or exceeds the applicable planning controls and guidelines, including separation distances for odour and wastewater, and satisfactory measures are proposed to address all identified impacts. Subject to detailed conditions, the application merits conditional development consent.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld. Development consent granted subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development consent is granted to DA05/0037 for the construction and operation of a 975 head feedlot and associated effluent ponds at Lots 230 and 233, DP 75364, Parish of Cullinga and County of Harden, subject to the conditions in Annexure A.' 'The exhibits may be returned except for...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment