MTE Developments Pty Ltd v The Hills Shire Council [2016] NSWLEC 1609
The Court, upon being satisfied that the agreement reached by the parties at the conciliation conference was one it could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, disposed of the proceedings by making orders consistent with that agreement as required by s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Parties
- Applicant: MTE Developments Pty Ltd; Applicant: SFN Projects Pty Ltd; Respondent: The Hills Shire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference; Orders Made Following Agreement
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions; costs ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Community Title Subdivision, Conciliation Conference, Aboriginal Heritage, Bushfire Protection, Contamination, Traffic, Stormwater Runoff, Flora and Fauna Impacts, Onsite Waste Disposal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MTE Developments Pty Ltd
Applicant
SFN Projects Pty Ltd
Applicant
The Hills Shire Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference; Orders Made Following Agreement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the development application for a rural cluster community title subdivision should be approved
Ratio Decidendi
The Court, upon being satisfied that the agreement reached by the parties at the conciliation conference was one it could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, disposed of the proceedings by making orders consistent with that agreement as required by s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions; costs ordered.
Orders
- The applicant is granted leave to amend the development application and rely on amended plans.
- The Appeal is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment