Khan v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 443
The proposed appeal had no realistic prospects of success because the Tribunal correctly determined it lacked jurisdiction due to non-payment of the prescribed fee as required by s 347(1), and the applicant failed to provide a full and satisfactory explanation for delay; thus, the application for an extension of time was refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Application to Federal Court for Extension of Time to File and Serve Notice of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time refused
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time' 'jurisdiction of Tribunal' 'validity of Review Application' 'payment of Prescribed Fee' 'appeals Process']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Application to Federal Court for Extension of Time to File and Serve Notice of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an extension of time to file and serve notice of appeal should be granted' "Whether the applicant's explanation for delay is sufficient" 'Whether the proposed appeal has realistic prospects of success']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed appeal had no realistic prospects of success because the Tribunal correctly determined it lacked jurisdiction due to non-payment of the prescribed fee as required by s 347(1), and the applicant failed to provide a full and satisfactory explanation for delay; thus, the application for an extension of time was refused.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time refused
Orders
- ['The application for an extension of time be refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment