Muir v Open Brethren [1956] HCA 14
On the proper construction of the will, the words introduced by "in particular", reinforced by the bracketed words preserving discretion, identified a particular class of persons in need, distress or indigent circumstances rather than an additional non-charitable purpose. The whole residuary trust was therefore for the relief of poverty and was a valid charitable bequest.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Concerning the Validity of a Residuary Bequest as a Charitable Bequest / Appeal From an Order of Gibson J. in the Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['charitable Bequests' 'relief of Poverty' 'construction of Wills' 'mixed Charitable and Non Charitable Purposes' 'uncertainty']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Concerning the Validity of a Residuary Bequest as a Charitable Bequest / Appeal From an Order of Gibson J. in the Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the residuary provision in the testator's will was a valid charitable bequest or void." 'Whether the words concerning assisting and relieving persons adversely affected by the effects of the War created an inseverable non-charitable purpose or merely identified a particular class within the relief of poverty.']
Ratio Decidendi
On the proper construction of the will, the words introduced by "in particular", reinforced by the bracketed words preserving discretion, identified a particular class of persons in need, distress or indigent circumstances rather than an additional non-charitable purpose. The whole residuary trust was therefore for the relief of poverty and was a valid charitable bequest.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment