Multigroup Distribution Services Pty Ltd v TNT Australia Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 478

Multigroup Distribution Services Pty Ltd v TNT Australia Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 478

The proper construction of Order 2 obliges the applicant to file all intended witness statements by 31 July 1997 unless they arise from subsequent inspection, subpoenaed documents or further inquiries, or were otherwise not reasonably capable of prior filing. New statements or documentary evidence outside these limits require the applicant to seek leave from the court. Allowing introduction of such new material may impact preparation and fairness but, to do justice, the applicant should have the opportunity to apply for leave to introduce the lost customer reports.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 April 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Determination Regarding Compliance With Case Management Orders
Outcome
Applicant afforded opportunity to seek leave to introduce new evidence (lost customer reports); no guillotine orders to be made at this stage; parties to bring in short minutes to give effect to reasons.
Legal Topics
['particularisation' 'admissibility of Evidence' 'case Management Orders']
['procedure'] ['particularisation' 'admissibility of Evidence' 'case Management Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory Determination Regarding Compliance With Case Management Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Proper construction of Order 2 made by Burchett J on 7 March 1997 regarding witness statements and particulars' 'Whether witness statements filed after 31 July 1997 require leave' "Admissibility and timing for 'lost customer reports' in applicant's case" 'Whether further witness statements can expand the particulars without leave']

Ratio Decidendi

The proper construction of Order 2 obliges the applicant to file all intended witness statements by 31 July 1997 unless they arise from subsequent inspection, subpoenaed documents or further inquiries, or were otherwise not reasonably capable of prior filing. New statements or documentary evidence outside these limits require the applicant to seek leave from the court. Allowing introduction of such new material may impact preparation and fairness but, to do justice, the applicant should have the opportunity to apply for leave to introduce the lost customer reports.

Court Disposition

Applicant afforded opportunity to seek leave to introduce new evidence (lost customer reports); no guillotine orders to be made at this stage; parties to bring in short minutes to give effect to reasons.

Orders

  • ['Applicant to seek leave to rely upon lost customer reports as evidence.' 'No guillotine-type orders to be made regarding case directions.' 'Applicant to give notice of all documents proposed to be tendered, other than those already disclosed, by 30 June 2001.']