Multipye v Shakespeare's [2005] NSWSC 814
There was a genuine dispute as to $4647.96 of the demanded amount, and $1668.82 had been paid since the issuance of the demand; no valid offsetting claim was established in relation to the supply company. Therefore, the statutory demand was varied to reduce the amount to $52,776.76.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 August 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- Statutory demand varied; costs to defendant
- Legal Topics
- ['statutory Demand' 'genuine Dispute' 'offsetting Claim' 'variation of Demand']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there is a genuine dispute as to the amount claimed in the statutory demand under s 459G of the Corporations Act' 'Whether an offsetting claim exists against the company issuing the demand']
Ratio Decidendi
There was a genuine dispute as to $4647.96 of the demanded amount, and $1668.82 had been paid since the issuance of the demand; no valid offsetting claim was established in relation to the supply company. Therefore, the statutory demand was varied to reduce the amount to $52,776.76.
Court Disposition
Statutory demand varied; costs to defendant
Orders
- ['Statutory demand be reduced by $6316.78 to $52,776.76' "Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings" 'Exhibits be returned']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment