MULWAREE SHIRE COUNCIL v BEZZINA [1995] NSWCA 303
Leave to re-argue the correctness of previously decided cases is not warranted, as the court finds no reason to depart from its prior rulings regarding the construction of transitional provisions and para(g) of Interpretation paragraphs.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mulwaree Shire Council; Respondent: Bezzina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 June 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Transitional Provisions, Table of Compensation for Permanent Injuries
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mulwaree Shire Council
Appellant
Bezzina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to re-argue authority regarding construction of para(g) of Interpretation paragraphs of Table following s73 of Workers Compensation Act 1987
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to re-argue the correctness of previously decided cases is not warranted, as the court finds no reason to depart from its prior rulings regarding the construction of transitional provisions and para(g) of Interpretation paragraphs.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment